<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Art in Beijing III: Huang Liaoyuan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brendanmcgetrick.com/blog/2006/08/15/art-in-beijing-iii-huang-liaoyuan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brendanmcgetrick.com/blog/2006/08/15/art-in-beijing-iii-huang-liaoyuan/</link>
	<description>100% real talk 50% of the time.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.brendanmcgetrick.com/blog/2006/08/15/art-in-beijing-iii-huang-liaoyuan/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brendanmcgetrick.com/blog/2006/08/15/art-in-beijing-iii-huang-liaoyuan/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric. Thanks for your comment. 

I didn't know anybody was still looking at this. 

I think your analysis makes sense. I guess it was just the setting up of NY and Jersalem as polar opposites that threw me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric. Thanks for your comment. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know anybody was still looking at this. </p>
<p>I think your analysis makes sense. I guess it was just the setting up of NY and Jersalem as polar opposites that threw me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.brendanmcgetrick.com/blog/2006/08/15/art-in-beijing-iii-huang-liaoyuan/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brendanmcgetrick.com/blog/2006/08/15/art-in-beijing-iii-huang-liaoyuan/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>"In the human history, the proletariat and bourgeoisie (Socialism and Capitalism) has never confronted with each other so blatantly, which used to be between poor and rich (New York and Jerusalem)."

Is this what's confusing you?. I guess he's talking the replacement of money (New York) for spirituality (Jerusalem) in society. 
Maybe in a Chinese context communism was a kind fo religion and now that's in conflict the new society which is more money driven...

Good interview by the way. Keep it up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the human history, the proletariat and bourgeoisie (Socialism and Capitalism) has never confronted with each other so blatantly, which used to be between poor and rich (New York and Jerusalem).&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this what&#8217;s confusing you?. I guess he&#8217;s talking the replacement of money (New York) for spirituality (Jerusalem) in society.<br />
Maybe in a Chinese context communism was a kind fo religion and now that&#8217;s in conflict the new society which is more money driven&#8230;</p>
<p>Good interview by the way. Keep it up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

